PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-30.55%
Revenue decline while 9698.HK shows 6.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-31.67%
Cost reduction while 9698.HK shows 6.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-17.22%
Gross profit decline while 9698.HK shows 6.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
19.19%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 0.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.72%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-21.49%
Marketing expense reduction while 9698.HK shows 3.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
100.00%
Other expenses change of 100.00% while 9698.HK maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-19.43%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-31.04%
Total costs reduction while 9698.HK shows 5.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
9.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-10.95%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
28.23%
EBITDA margin growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-12.26%
Operating income decline while 9698.HK shows 13.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
26.33%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 6.58%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.39%
Other expenses growth while 9698.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
19.65%
Pre-tax margin growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
123.29%
Tax expense growth while 9698.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-37.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.55%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.55%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.00%
Share count increase while 9698.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.