PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.22%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x 9698.HK's 6.50%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
6.98%
Similar cost growth to 9698.HK's 6.40%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
9.63%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x 9698.HK's 6.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
2.24%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 0.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.09%
G&A growth while 9698.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
27.03%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 3.70%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.97%
Operating expenses growth while 9698.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.06%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x 9698.HK's 5.42%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.93%
D&A reduction while 9698.HK shows 0.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-20.34%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.96%
Operating income decline while 9698.HK shows 13.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.35%
Operating margin decline while 9698.HK shows 6.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
27.03%
Other expenses growth while 9698.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.46%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.08%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
23.57%
Net income growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.25%
Net margin growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.48%
EPS growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.48%
Diluted EPS growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.00%
Share count increase while 9698.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.