PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.85%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 4.88%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
22.97%
Cost growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 5.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-13.84%
Gross profit decline while 9698.HK shows 1.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-28.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.29%
G&A growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 21.40%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
24.53%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 16.35%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.14%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of 9698.HK's 19.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
22.20%
Total costs growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 8.88%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.10%
D&A growth less than half of 9698.HK's 13.82%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-56.43%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-63.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-59.70%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-66.38%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.66%
Other expenses growth while 9698.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-102.73%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-102.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.60%
Tax expense reduction while 9698.HK shows 86.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-108.82%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-107.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-109.50%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-109.50%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.24%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-7.18%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.