PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.81%
Revenue growth below 50% of 9698.HK's 19.09%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.64%
Cost growth less than half of 9698.HK's 20.38%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-11.22%
Gross profit decline while 9698.HK shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-11.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.77%
G&A growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 6.91%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
25.79%
Marketing expense growth while 9698.HK reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.91%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 5.12%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
2.69%
Total costs growth less than half of 9698.HK's 17.08%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.77%
D&A growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 12.10%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-116.33%
EBITDA decline while 9698.HK shows 20.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-116.20%
EBITDA margin decline while 9698.HK shows 1.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-126.45%
Operating income decline while 9698.HK shows 78.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-126.23%
Operating margin decline while 9698.HK shows 50.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.99%
Other expenses growth while 9698.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-899.14%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-892.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
69.75%
Tax expense growth 1.25-1.5x 9698.HK's 55.58%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize strategy.
-6681.17%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6628.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6600.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6600.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.11%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 12.26%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
2.11%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 12.26%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.