PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-37.92%
Revenue decline while 9698.HK shows 8.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-38.53%
Cost reduction while 9698.HK shows 8.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-32.44%
Gross profit decline while 9698.HK shows 10.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.83%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 1.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.86%
G&A growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 1.56%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-15.86%
Marketing expense reduction while 9698.HK shows 10.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.84%
Operating expenses reduction while 9698.HK shows 4.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-37.51%
Total costs reduction while 9698.HK shows 7.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.73%
Similar D&A growth to 9698.HK's 11.58%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
36.17%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 14.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
119.35%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 4.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
39.12%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 25.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
124.12%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 15.01%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-126.47%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-6.24%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
51.03%
Pre-tax margin growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-51.11%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
9.82%
Net income growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
76.91%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 5.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
8.00%
EPS change of 8.00% while 9698.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
8.00%
Diluted EPS change of 8.00% while 9698.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
1.70%
Share count reduction below 50% of 9698.HK's 0.25%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.70%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of 9698.HK's 0.25%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.