PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.39%
Revenue decline while 9698.HK shows 10.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-20.88%
Cost reduction while 9698.HK shows 6.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.05%
Gross profit decline while 9698.HK shows 23.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
15.30%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x 9698.HK's 11.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-34.15%
G&A reduction while 9698.HK shows 4.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-9.59%
Marketing expense reduction while 9698.HK shows 7.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.49%
Operating expenses reduction while 9698.HK shows 4.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.18%
Total costs reduction while 9698.HK shows 6.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.87%
D&A reduction while 9698.HK shows 5.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-46.58%
EBITDA decline while 9698.HK shows 15.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.73%
EBITDA margin decline while 9698.HK shows 4.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-49.95%
Operating income decline while 9698.HK shows 49.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.92%
Operating margin decline while 9698.HK shows 34.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
110.09%
Other expenses growth while 9698.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.50%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x 9698.HK's 23.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
55.68%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 30.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
274.83%
Tax expense growth while 9698.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.57%
Net income decline while 9698.HK shows 31.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.70%
Net margin growth below 50% of 9698.HK's 38.27%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-10.80%
EPS decline while 9698.HK shows 35.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.80%
Diluted EPS decline while 9698.HK shows 35.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.83%
Share count reduction while 9698.HK shows 8.84% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.83%
Diluted share reduction while 9698.HK shows 8.84% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.