Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-43.71%
Revenue decline while 9698.HK shows 7.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-48.40%
Cost reduction while 9698.HK shows 7.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.71%
Gross profit decline while 9698.HK shows 5.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
65.73%
Margin expansion while 9698.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.16%
G&A growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 10.75%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
21.95%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 12.98%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.91%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x 9698.HK's 10.20%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-42.19%
Total costs reduction while 9698.HK shows 8.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.33%
D&A reduction while 9698.HK shows 6.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-95.56%
EBITDA decline while 9698.HK shows 4.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-92.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-94.48%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-90.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-52.31%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-72.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-49.77%
Tax expense reduction while 9698.HK shows 24.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-106.29%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-111.17%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-105.88%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-105.88%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.05%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 10.00%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26