PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-36.84%
Revenue decline while 9698.HK shows 6.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-37.56%
Cost reduction while 9698.HK shows 5.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-31.68%
Gross profit decline while 9698.HK shows 6.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.18%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 0.83%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.43%
G&A growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 7.07%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
-14.33%
Marketing expense reduction while 9698.HK shows 22.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.75%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 9.71%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-22.86%
Total costs reduction while 9698.HK shows 6.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.40%
D&A reduction while 9698.HK shows 5.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-85.77%
EBITDA decline while 9698.HK shows 9.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-194.13%
EBITDA margin decline while 9698.HK shows 3.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-65.33%
Operating income decline while 9698.HK shows 1.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-161.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
59.52%
Other expenses growth while 9698.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-66.47%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-163.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2014.45%
Tax expense growth while 9698.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-131.12%
Net income decline while 9698.HK shows 2.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-265.94%
Net margin decline while 9698.HK shows 8.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-126.95%
EPS decline while 9698.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-126.95%
Diluted EPS decline while 9698.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.00%
Share count reduction while 9698.HK shows 0.25% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.