PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.56%
Revenue growth below 50% of PONY's 53.48%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
5.83%
Cost growth less than half of PONY's 54.27%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
14.43%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PONY's 49.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.38%
Margin expansion while PONY shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.09%
G&A reduction while PONY shows 44.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
29.01%
Marketing expense change of 29.01% while PONY maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
10.94%
Other expenses change of 10.94% while PONY maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
12.70%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x PONY's 10.92%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
6.17%
Total costs growth less than half of PONY's 18.14%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-18.53%
Interest expense reduction while PONY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
22.11%
D&A change of 22.11% while PONY maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
18.08%
EBITDA growth while PONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.81%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PONY's 28.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.88%
Operating income growth while PONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.63%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PONY's 28.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.31%
Other expenses growth while PONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.39%
Pre-tax income growth while PONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.30%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x PONY's 7.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
613.71%
Tax expense change of 613.71% while PONY maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
13.85%
Net income growth while PONY declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.85%
Net margin growth below 50% of PONY's 19.52%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-17.05%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.05%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
34.70%
Share count reduction below 50% of PONY's 4.32%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
34.70%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PONY's 4.32%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.