PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
45.70%
Similar revenue growth to PONY's 53.48%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
50.63%
Similar cost growth to PONY's 54.27%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
2.76%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PONY's 49.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-29.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.06%
G&A growth less than half of PONY's 44.40%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
11.33%
Marketing expense change of 11.33% while PONY maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
85.86%
Other expenses change of 85.86% while PONY maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
19.74%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PONY's 10.92%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
48.82%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PONY's 18.14%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
42.99%
Interest expense change of 42.99% while PONY maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
29.04%
D&A change of 29.04% while PONY maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-10.45%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.54%
EBITDA margin decline while PONY shows 28.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.63%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.78%
Operating margin decline while PONY shows 28.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.21%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-35.97%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.06%
Pre-tax margin decline while PONY shows 7.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.13%
Tax expense reduction while PONY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-42.49%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.53%
Net margin decline while PONY shows 19.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.22%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.22%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.