PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-35.05%
Revenue decline while PONY shows 53.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-29.93%
Cost reduction while PONY shows 54.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-57.37%
Gross profit decline while PONY shows 49.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-34.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while PONY shows 3.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
1.86%
G&A growth less than half of PONY's 44.40%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
-18.54%
Marketing expense reduction while PONY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.33%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PONY's 10.92%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-23.94%
Total costs reduction while PONY shows 18.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4049.21%
D&A change of 4049.21% while PONY maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-8971.27%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13757.89%
EBITDA margin decline while PONY shows 28.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12840.57%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19714.91%
Operating margin decline while PONY shows 28.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
118.11%
Other expenses growth while PONY reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1106.15%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1649.03%
Pre-tax margin decline while PONY shows 7.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.18%
Tax expense reduction while PONY shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10932.16%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16884.71%
Net margin decline while PONY shows 19.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11650.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11650.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.05%
Share count reduction while PONY shows 4.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.