1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-34.02%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with 1097.HK at -1625.22%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.32%
Less D&A growth vs. 1097.HK's 7.82%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
114.67%
Deferred tax of 114.67% while 1097.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-78.86%
Negative yoy SBC while 1097.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
304.74%
Well above 1097.HK's 183.43% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.60%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. 1097.HK's 249.68%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
18.34%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. 1097.HK's 297.88%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
67.69%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x 1097.HK's 5.16%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
52.13%
Some CapEx rise while 1097.HK is negative at -123.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
137.70%
Acquisition growth of 137.70% while 1097.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
38.90%
Purchases growth of 38.90% while 1097.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-0.50%
We reduce yoy sales while 1097.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
48.73%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. 1097.HK's 204.78%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
58.44%
We have mild expansions while 1097.HK is negative at -18.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
We repay more while 1097.HK is negative at -203.15%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-74.23%
Negative yoy issuance while 1097.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.