PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-145.72%
Negative net income growth while 1113.HK stands at 48.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-23.72%
Negative yoy D&A while 1113.HK is 88.64%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-203.79%
Negative yoy working capital usage while 1113.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-300.00%
AR is negative yoy while 1113.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-300.00%
Negative yoy inventory while 1113.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
119.63%
Growth of 119.63% while 1113.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
239.18%
Well above 1113.HK's 96.10%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-111.34%
Negative yoy CFO while 1113.HK is 1967.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-204.28%
Negative yoy CapEx while 1113.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
12.06%
Acquisition growth of 12.06% while 1113.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
59.20%
Purchases growth of 59.20% while 1113.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-28.56%
We reduce yoy sales while 1113.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
250.21%
We have some outflow growth while 1113.HK is negative at -156.82%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
265.36%
We have mild expansions while 1113.HK is negative at -99.53%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while 1113.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.