PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
257.75%
Some net income increase while 1113.HK is negative at -12.33%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
1.75%
Less D&A growth vs. 1113.HK's 124.31%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-768.83%
Negative yoy deferred tax while 1113.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-64.74%
Negative yoy SBC while 1113.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-139.94%
Negative yoy working capital usage while 1113.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while 1113.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while 1113.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while 1113.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-151.16%
Negative yoy usage while 1113.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-11.56%
Both negative yoy, with 1113.HK at -111.04%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
3.36%
Some CFO growth while 1113.HK is negative at -70.89%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-128.41%
Negative yoy CapEx while 1113.HK is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.31%
Less M&A spending yoy vs. 1113.HK's 14419.35%, reducing near-term risk. David Dodd would confirm the firm is not missing out on a strategic deal that competitor might exploit.
17.44%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. 1113.HK's 71.33%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
271.06%
Below 50% of 1113.HK's 17236.62%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
215.91%
Growth well above 1113.HK's 80.57%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
30.06%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. 1113.HK's 1049.75%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
573.96%
Stock issuance far above 1113.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.