PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-106.93%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with 1113.HK at -32.16%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.00%
D&A growth well above 1113.HK's 1.78%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
100.00%
Deferred tax of 100.00% while 1113.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
100.00%
SBC growth of 100.00% while 1113.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
217.04%
Working capital change of 217.04% while 1113.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
187.68%
Growth of 187.68% while 1113.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-90.74%
Negative yoy while 1113.HK is 89.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
80.89%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of 1113.HK's 228.73%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-75.56%
Negative yoy CapEx while 1113.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
528.57%
Acquisition growth of 528.57% while 1113.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-801.72%
Both yoy lines negative, with 1113.HK at -412.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
2198.91%
Liquidation growth of 2198.91% while 1113.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-1078.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with 1113.HK at -710.22%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-138.12%
Both yoy lines negative, with 1113.HK at -3209.65%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
100.00%
We repay more while 1113.HK is negative at -1030.28%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-81.13%
Negative yoy issuance while 1113.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.