PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
89.1K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.12 | -0.08
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
99.52%
Some net income increase while 1177.HK is negative at -18.12%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-80.68%
Negative yoy D&A while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-100.00%
Negative yoy SBC while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
59.20%
Working capital change of 59.20% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
91.82%
Well above 1177.HK's 18.12%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-309.88%
Negative yoy CFO while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
86.91%
CapEx growth of 86.91% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
-89.12%
Negative yoy acquisition while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.89%
We reduce yoy other investing while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-138.13%
We reduce yoy invests while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.