PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-44.07%
Negative net income growth while 1177.HK stands at 32.07%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-29.13%
Negative yoy D&A while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21090.24%
Negative yoy working capital usage while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-1967.87%
AR is negative yoy while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-1282.55%
Negative yoy inventory while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.28%
Growth of 95.28% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
295.51%
Some yoy increase while 1177.HK is negative at -32.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
61.25%
CFO growth of 61.25% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
-65.43%
Negative yoy CapEx while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
48.01%
Acquisition growth of 48.01% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
88.46%
Purchases growth of 88.46% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-74.80%
We reduce yoy sales while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
225.28%
Growth of 225.28% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
170.00%
We expand invests by 170.00% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.