PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-28.65%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with 1177.HK at -22.89%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
23.50%
D&A growth of 23.50% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-284.79%
Negative yoy deferred tax while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-67.16%
Negative yoy SBC while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
90.20%
Working capital change of 90.20% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
29.80%
Inventory growth of 29.80% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
81.72%
Growth of 81.72% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-233.84%
Negative yoy while 1177.HK is 22.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-2.56%
Negative yoy CFO while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-0.88%
Negative yoy CapEx while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.65%
Growth of 14.65% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
37.39%
We expand invests by 37.39% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
185.94%
Issuance growth of 185.94% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.