Hong Kong Technology Venture Company Limited (1137.HK)

Both yoy net incomes decline, with 1177.HK at -31.41%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.

D&A growth of 56.25% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.

Negative yoy deferred tax while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.

Working capital change of 181.45% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.

AR growth of 100.00% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.

Inventory growth of 60.35% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.

AP growth of 100.00% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.

Growth of 331.42% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.

Well above 1177.HK's 31.41%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.

CapEx growth of 8.21% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.

Acquisition growth of 100.00% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.

Negative yoy purchasing while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.

We reduce yoy sales while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.

We reduce yoy other investing while 1177.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.

We reduce yoy invests while 1177.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.

Issuance growth of 23.54% while 1177.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.