Hong Kong Technology Venture Company Limited (1137.HK)

Negative net income growth while 1475.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.

Negative yoy D&A while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.

Negative yoy working capital usage while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.

Negative yoy usage while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.

Growth of 23802.87% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.

Negative yoy CFO while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.

CapEx growth of 100.00% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.

We reduce yoy sales while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.

We reduce yoy other investing while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.

We reduce yoy invests while 1475.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.