PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
104.84%
Some net income increase while 1475.HK is negative at -45.54%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
19.66%
D&A growth of 19.66% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
345.67%
Deferred tax of 345.67% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-99.58%
Negative yoy SBC while 1475.HK is 246.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-429.71%
Negative yoy working capital usage while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-300.00%
Negative yoy inventory while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
Growth of 200.00% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
-236.64%
Negative yoy while 1475.HK is 43.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
24.80%
CFO growth of 24.80% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
19.26%
CapEx growth of 19.26% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
0.98%
Acquisition growth of 0.98% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
96.20%
Purchases growth of 96.20% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-38.02%
We reduce yoy sales while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
166.60%
Growth of 166.60% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
392.11%
We expand invests by 392.11% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
-7.66%
We cut debt repayment yoy while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-60.11%
Negative yoy issuance while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.