PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-184.58%
Negative net income growth while 1475.HK stands at 19.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
22.41%
D&A growth of 22.41% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
118.34%
Deferred tax of 118.34% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-37.25%
Negative yoy SBC while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
183.98%
Working capital change of 183.98% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
165.56%
Growth of 165.56% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
45.40%
Some yoy increase while 1475.HK is negative at -22.09%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
262.25%
CFO growth of 262.25% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a modest edge that could widen if cost discipline remains strong.
-18.25%
Negative yoy CapEx while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-9977.55%
Negative yoy acquisition while 1475.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-73.66%
Negative yoy purchasing while 1475.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
159.35%
Liquidation growth of 159.35% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-200.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-157.29%
We reduce yoy invests while 1475.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-86.46%
Negative yoy issuance while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.