PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-34.02%
Negative net income growth while 1475.HK stands at 4.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
2.32%
D&A growth of 2.32% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
114.67%
Deferred tax of 114.67% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
-78.86%
Negative yoy SBC while 1475.HK is 478.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
304.74%
Working capital change of 304.74% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.60%
Growth of 113.60% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a difference in minor WC usage that might affect short-term cash flow if large.
18.34%
Some yoy increase while 1475.HK is negative at -7.33%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
67.69%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of 1475.HK's 478.79%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
52.13%
CapEx growth of 52.13% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
137.70%
Acquisition growth of 137.70% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
38.90%
Purchases growth of 38.90% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-0.50%
We reduce yoy sales while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
48.73%
Growth of 48.73% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
58.44%
We expand invests by 58.44% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
-74.23%
Negative yoy issuance while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.