PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-42.27%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with 1475.HK at -44.61%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
3.22%
D&A growth of 3.22% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-814.38%
Negative yoy deferred tax while 1475.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-703.50%
Negative yoy SBC while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-154.56%
Negative yoy working capital usage while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-921.71%
Negative yoy usage while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-13.18%
Negative yoy while 1475.HK is 44.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-63.88%
Negative yoy CFO while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
22.53%
CapEx growth of 22.53% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
-95.98%
Negative yoy acquisition while 1475.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-142.48%
Negative yoy purchasing while 1475.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-51.78%
We reduce yoy sales while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
14.39%
Growth of 14.39% while 1475.HK is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-60.55%
We reduce yoy invests while 1475.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.36%
Negative yoy issuance while 1475.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.