PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-106.93%
Negative net income growth while Specialty Retail median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
3.00%
D&A growth of 3.00% while Specialty Retail median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
100.00%
Deferred tax growth of 100.00% while Specialty Retail median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
100.00%
SBC growth of 100.00% while Specialty Retail median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
217.04%
Working capital of 217.04% while Specialty Retail median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
187.68%
Growth of 187.68% while Specialty Retail median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-90.74%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Specialty Retail median is 3.13%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
80.89%
CFO growth of 80.89% while Specialty Retail median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-75.56%
CapEx declines yoy while Specialty Retail median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
528.57%
Acquisition growth of 528.57% while Specialty Retail median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-801.72%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Specialty Retail median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
2198.91%
Proceeds growth of 2198.91% while Specialty Retail median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-1078.38%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Specialty Retail median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-138.12%
Reduced investing yoy while Specialty Retail median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Specialty Retail median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-81.13%
We reduce issuance yoy while Specialty Retail median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.