PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
250.64%
Net income growth of 250.64% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-23.30%
D&A shrinks yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-963.72%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.61%
Inventory growth of 24.61% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1099.00%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
14.73%
Growth of 14.73% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-1.48%
Negative CFO growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-27.12%
CapEx declines yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-100.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
42.34%
Growth of 42.34% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-231.73%
Reduced investing yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
754.15%
Issuance growth of 754.15% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.