PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-184.58%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
22.41%
D&A growth of 22.41% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
118.34%
Deferred tax growth of 118.34% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-37.25%
SBC declines yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
183.98%
Working capital of 183.98% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
165.56%
Growth of 165.56% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
45.40%
Growth of 45.40% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
262.25%
CFO growth of 262.25% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-18.25%
CapEx declines yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-9977.55%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
-73.66%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
159.35%
Proceeds growth of 159.35% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-200.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-157.29%
Reduced investing yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-86.46%
We reduce issuance yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.