PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.34%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0315.HK's 23.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
24.74%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0315.HK's 112.92%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
84.81%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 23.19%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
2295.40%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 22.61%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-42.74%
Negative net income growth while 0315.HK stands at 14.41%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-57.93%
Negative EPS growth while 0315.HK is at 15.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-61.49%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0315.HK is at 15.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-7.85%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-8.69%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.14%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
3551.69%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
146.88%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
34.91%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
177.47%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
280.14%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 19.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-37.54%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
93.29%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
70.78%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
45.80%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 2.88%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
-17.40%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 0315.HK stands at 40.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
29.23%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 5.20%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1.66%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0315.HK's 1.93%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0315.HK invests at 12.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.22%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 0315.HK's 135.69%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-10.57%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.71%
We have a declining book value while 0315.HK shows 2.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-4.67%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.19%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.