PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.89%
Negative revenue growth while 0315.HK stands at 7.50%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-14.07%
Negative gross profit growth while 0315.HK is at 7.50%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-83.31%
Negative EBIT growth while 0315.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-81.90%
Negative operating income growth while 0315.HK is at 7.50%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-80.77%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0315.HK's 0.19%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.07%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 0315.HK's 0.19%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
81.69%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while 0315.HK cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-50.82%
Negative OCF growth while 0315.HK is at 5.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-226.06%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.01%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0315.HK's 197.18%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-7.62%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 197.18%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.87%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK is at 331.15%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
136.10%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0315.HK's 331.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
108.82%
Below 50% of 0315.HK's 512.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-26.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is 512.29%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.13%
Dividend/share CAGR of 60.13% while 0315.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.38%
We cut SG&A while 0315.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.