PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.35%
Negative revenue growth while 0315.HK stands at 6.87%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
1.41%
Positive gross profit growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
36.84%
EBIT growth of 36.84% while 0315.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
36.40%
Positive operating income growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.25%
Net income growth under 50% of 0315.HK's 125.03%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1290.30%
Positive OCF growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
54.04%
Positive FCF growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 233.18%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-8.68%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 20.30%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
112.65%
Below 50% of 0315.HK's 381.89%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-53.57%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 17.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-310.77%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0315.HK is 186.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-157.59%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.31%
We expand SG&A while 0315.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.