PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.50%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of 0315.HK's 0.85%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
11.01%
Positive gross profit growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
208.19%
EBIT growth of 208.19% while 0315.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
208.19%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 87.83%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
120.30%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 75.01%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
1.39%
Slight or no buyback while 0315.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
108.39%
OCF growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 7.48%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
218.43%
Positive FCF growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.42%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 190.30%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-2.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 13.86%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.19%
Below 50% of 0315.HK's 141.94%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
87.68%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 20.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.28%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0315.HK is 36.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-41.99%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.37%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0315.HK invests at 227.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.37%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.