PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.95%
Share change of 1.95% while 0315.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.55%
Diluted share change of 0.55% while 0315.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-1.91%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
0.00%
OCF growth of 0.00% while 0315.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
0.00%
FCF growth of 0.00% while 0315.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.35%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 45.15%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-5.19%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 13.86%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.79%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to 0315.HK's 20.97%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
83.15%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 20.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-70.43%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-43.39%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.44%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0315.HK invests at 7.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.