1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.58%
Revenue growth of 8.58% while 0315.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
26.76%
Gross profit growth of 26.76% while 0315.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1779.25%
Negative operating income growth while 0315.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
61.69%
Net income growth of 61.69% while 0315.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
55.26%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 18.75%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
58.36%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 18.75%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
19.83%
Share change of 19.83% while 0315.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
14.75%
Diluted share change of 14.75% while 0315.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-16.55%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
0.00%
OCF growth of 0.00% while 0315.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
0.00%
FCF growth of 0.00% while 0315.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
9.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0315.HK's 59.37%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-57.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 15.08%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-52.32%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 2.60%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
210.73%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 125.66%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-25.62%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK is at 10.39%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
2100.08%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
232.25%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-75.58%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
140.36%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.53%
Dividend/share CAGR of 2.53% while 0315.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-53.47%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We cut SG&A while 0315.HK invests at 238.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.