1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0315.HK's 78.57%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
20.34%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to 0315.HK's 20.17%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
25.13%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 7.19%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
151.98%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0315.HK's 262.89%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
143.63%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 68.34%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
171.92%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 50.61%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
377.96%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 191.76% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
297.91%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
239.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 103.96%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.77%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0315.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-61.21%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.