PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0315.HK stands at 32.85%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
20.72%
Positive OCF growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
8.92%
Positive FCF growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 822.66%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 176.93%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 189.48%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 1731.85%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK is at 280.13%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 305.88%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0315.HK is at 1987.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
100.00%
Below 50% of 0315.HK's 629.60%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-100.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is 2495.15%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0315.HK invests at 311.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.