1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.97%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 361.33%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-99.97%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 176.93%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-99.98%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 189.48%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
44.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0315.HK's 815.93%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
20.87%
Below 50% of 0315.HK's 280.13%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-9.13%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 305.88%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-124.75%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0315.HK is at 943.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-183.69%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0315.HK is 629.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-111.91%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is 2495.15%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
605.53%
Dividend/share CAGR of 605.53% while 0315.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
692.20%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 692.20% while 0315.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.