PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.82%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
58.31%
Positive gross profit growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.02%
Positive operating income growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-145.72%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-144.83%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-144.83%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-111.34%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-133.64%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-92.97%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 369.58%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
22775.59%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 137.66%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
2990.65%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 28.02%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-222.25%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 26.34%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-149.48%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-263.02%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-517.17%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0315.HK is at 1130.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-3602.95%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0315.HK is 1.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-13520.87%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
210.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 46.19%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
10.06%
Below 50% of 0315.HK's 40.70%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-34.15%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
356.23%
We show growth while 0315.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-27.14%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-21.25%
We have a declining book value while 0315.HK shows 7.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-83.31%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
531.86%
SG&A growth of 531.86% while 0315.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.