PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.15%
Positive revenue growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
117.51%
Positive gross profit growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.99%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 1.84%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
78.22%
Positive net income growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
77.46%
Positive EPS growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
77.46%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.20%
Similar OCF growth to 0315.HK's 35.32%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
-4.08%
Negative FCF growth while 0315.HK is at 100.11%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-90.92%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 186.20%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1895.74%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-176.76%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 88.89%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.22%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-34.38%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0315.HK is at 437.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1383.05%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is 21.35%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.87%
Below 50% of 0315.HK's 39.19%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-99.62%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0315.HK shows 5.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-14.83%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.21%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.05%
We have a declining book value while 0315.HK shows 1.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-52.85%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.