PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
75.69%
Positive revenue growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
187.44%
Positive gross profit growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.81%
Positive operating income growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-4.44%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0315.HK's 1.92%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.07%
Negative OCF growth while 0315.HK is at 11.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-58.48%
Negative FCF growth while 0315.HK is at 22.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-83.82%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 74.75%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
51804.85%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
2575.51%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-146.22%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 107.04%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-138.24%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
31.75%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-804.83%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0315.HK is at 273.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-742.20%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-307.69%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is 17.05%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
176.96%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 38.69%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
6.27%
Below 50% of 0315.HK's 36.46%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0315.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0315.HK invests at 29.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0315.HK shows 10.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
36.39%
We show growth while 0315.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.81%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-6.06%
We have a declining book value while 0315.HK shows 1.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
444.00%
We have some new debt while 0315.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.