PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
37.14%
Positive revenue growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
34.50%
Positive gross profit growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-29.21%
Negative EBIT growth while 0315.HK is at 8.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
8.25%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of 0315.HK's 10.10%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
-28.65%
Negative net income growth while 0315.HK stands at 15.77%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-30.77%
Negative EPS growth while 0315.HK is at 15.38%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-30.77%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0315.HK is at 15.38%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.24%
Share count expansion well above 0315.HK's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.24%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0315.HK's 0.08%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.56%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-1.94%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-3.78%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 178.61%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
11301.73%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
543.21%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-154.74%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
29.96%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-90.57%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-552.26%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0315.HK is at 1457.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-1545.34%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
40.64%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.62%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0315.HK is at 48.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-40.12%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0315.HK is at 17.27%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0315.HK stands at 123.29%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 1.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0315.HK shows 156.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
20.44%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 0315.HK's 97.53%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-4.34%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-8.62%
We have a declining book value while 0315.HK shows 2.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
24.79%
We have some new debt while 0315.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-57.76%
We cut SG&A while 0315.HK invests at 129882.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.