PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.67%
Positive revenue growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
37.54%
Positive gross profit growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
106.77%
Positive EBIT growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-3.87%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
104.84%
Positive net income growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
104.88%
Positive EPS growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
104.88%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.29%
Share count expansion well above 0315.HK's 0.30%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.29%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0315.HK's 0.33%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.80%
OCF growth under 50% of 0315.HK's 471.37%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
22.77%
FCF growth under 50% of 0315.HK's 890.33%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-46.01%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 72.90%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
11235.06%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
861.29%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-130.40%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 160.37%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
40.30%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 0.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
32.39%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0315.HK's 72.75%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-94.86%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0315.HK is at 1300.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
120.89%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 23.43%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
101.17%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.56%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0315.HK is at 47.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-24.09%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0315.HK is at 11.42%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0315.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 100.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.60%
We show growth while 0315.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-4.84%
Negative asset growth while 0315.HK invests at 3.13%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-0.16%
We have a declining book value while 0315.HK shows 2.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-71.03%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
132.92%
We expand SG&A while 0315.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.