PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.19%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of 0315.HK's 31.85%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
-16.23%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1724.67%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
2.41%
Positive operating income growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-2395.97%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2389.16%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-2389.16%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.16%
Slight or no buybacks while 0315.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.16%
Slight or no buyback while 0315.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.59%
Positive OCF growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
20.17%
Positive FCF growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-33.59%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 103.88%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
64142.86%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
815.52%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-121.97%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 20.89%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-20.09%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
22.17%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-217.80%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0315.HK is at 71.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-29.05%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-22.71%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.75%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0315.HK is at 33.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-26.24%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0315.HK is at 9.75%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0315.HK stands at 229.09%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.73%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 0315.HK's 122.96%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
11.49%
Asset growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 7.16%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-7.74%
We have a declining book value while 0315.HK shows 0.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
390.08%
Debt growth far above 0315.HK's 41.03%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
306.60%
We expand SG&A while 0315.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.