PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.04%
Positive revenue growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
26.47%
Positive gross profit growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
16.15%
Positive EBIT growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.41%
Positive operating income growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
13.43%
Positive net income growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
15.79%
Positive EPS growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
15.79%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.75%
Share count expansion well above 0315.HK's 0.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.75%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0315.HK's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.35%
OCF growth under 50% of 0315.HK's 54.29%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-12.85%
Negative FCF growth while 0315.HK is at 184.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-13.79%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 30.67%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
1379.14%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
551.89%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-122.95%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 86.41%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
56.99%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
44.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0315.HK's 35.61%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
-206.81%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
77.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-0.95%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.08%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0315.HK is at 22.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-28.34%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0315.HK is at 7.55%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0315.HK stands at 127.99%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.22%
We show growth while 0315.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.35%
Positive asset growth while 0315.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-8.73%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
53.68%
We have some new debt while 0315.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.18%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.