PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
69.96%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 18.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
159.62%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 16.24%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
191.42%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 104.06%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
161.85%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 54.32%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
181.23%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x 0315.HK's 134.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
175.00%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x 0315.HK's 140.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
175.00%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x 0315.HK's 140.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
7.72%
Slight or no buybacks while 0315.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
9.87%
Slight or no buyback while 0315.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
621.17%
Positive OCF growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
299.67%
Positive FCF growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
36.02%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
1934.53%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
501.36%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
11.06%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
539.76%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 25.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
558.73%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-19.45%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
142.55%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
203.94%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.26%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0315.HK is at 21.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-4.31%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0315.HK is at 6.70%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0315.HK stands at 1.67%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.86%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 0315.HK's 86.36%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
15.61%
Positive asset growth while 0315.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
28.61%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 1.63%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-57.16%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.11%
We expand SG&A while 0315.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.