PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.77%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 7.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
13.75%
Positive gross profit growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-32.01%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-105.70%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-32.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-32.08%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-36.92%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
3.07%
Slight or no buybacks while 0315.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
8.83%
Slight or no buyback while 0315.HK is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.66%
Negative OCF growth while 0315.HK is at 6.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-13.97%
Negative FCF growth while 0315.HK is at 54.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
594344.75%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
2498.60%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
381.85%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-11.76%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
278.35%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 99.63%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
302.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 49.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
522.96%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
111.42%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
160.68%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
158.32%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 66.79%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-16.81%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0315.HK is at 14.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-0.02%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0315.HK is at 7.53%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.86%
We show growth while 0315.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
8.28%
Asset growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 4.10%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.20%
1.25-1.5x 0315.HK's 1.07%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
16.40%
We have some new debt while 0315.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.93%
SG&A growth well above 0315.HK's 4.42%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.