1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.29%
Negative revenue growth while 0315.HK stands at 9.08%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
1.14%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0315.HK's 9.77%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
27.53%
EBIT growth similar to 0315.HK's 26.02%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
1410.11%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 30.25%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
28.96%
Net income growth at 50-75% of 0315.HK's 41.21%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
22.70%
EPS growth at 50-75% of 0315.HK's 43.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
32.10%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of 0315.HK's 43.75%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.48%
Slight or no buybacks while 0315.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-2.63%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.68%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-108.88%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1876.81%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
246.02%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.61%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 24.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
138.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0315.HK's 450.68%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
167.32%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
160.68%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.82%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0315.HK is at 13.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
15.12%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 6.30%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.84%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 0315.HK's 245.64%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
2.66%
Asset growth well under 50% of 0315.HK's 19.78%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.21%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 1.41%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
25.60%
We have some new debt while 0315.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.84%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.