PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.19%
Positive revenue growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.62%
Positive gross profit growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-184.03%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-269.98%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-184.58%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-188.40%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-188.40%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.15%
Slight or no buybacks while 0315.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-4.03%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
262.25%
Positive OCF growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
607.60%
FCF growth above 1.5x 0315.HK's 24.50%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
619104.39%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
1092.96%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
181.58%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-38.63%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
260.50%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 9.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
283.47%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-358.45%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
45.57%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-1162.13%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
152.31%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 54.95%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
-8.90%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0315.HK is at 11.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
7.04%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 3.54%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-42.33%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.08%
We show growth while 0315.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.43%
Positive asset growth while 0315.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-7.19%
We have a declining book value while 0315.HK shows 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
39.38%
Debt growth far above 0315.HK's 1.05%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.23%
We expand SG&A while 0315.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.