PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.84%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-3.95%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-24.76%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-64.68%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-34.02%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-34.71%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-31.31%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.27%
Share count expansion well above 0315.HK's 0.10%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.55%
Reduced diluted shares while 0315.HK is at 0.82%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.69%
Positive OCF growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
45912.08%
Positive FCF growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
98192.55%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
489.72%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
115.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 9.75%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
248.29%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 54.32%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
342.41%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 29.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
596.77%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1844.27%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
168.03%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
155.77%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-4.80%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 0315.HK stands at 60.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
3.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0315.HK's 7.24%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
35.34%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 2.47%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-94.27%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.27%
We show growth while 0315.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-61.88%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-100.00%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
15.45%
We have some new debt while 0315.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
We expand SG&A while 0315.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.