PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.43 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
880.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.45%
Positive revenue growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
12.25%
Positive gross profit growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-89.47%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-530.70%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-106.93%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-107.21%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-107.36%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-3.79%
Share reduction while 0315.HK is at 1.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-5.94%
Reduced diluted shares while 0315.HK is at 1.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.89%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x 0315.HK's 55.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
89.37%
FCF growth similar to 0315.HK's 93.48%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
40423.24%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
257.50%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
32.25%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
228.03%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 19.60%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
314.45%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 18.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-18.70%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK stands at 2.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
90.46%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-145.65%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-104.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is 24.81%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
3.96%
Below 50% of 0315.HK's 51.29%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
14.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 2.75%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
4.89%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 0.34%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0315.HK stands at 159.95%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.17%
We show growth while 0315.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-4.51%
Negative asset growth while 0315.HK invests at 4.26%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.49%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-12.81%
We’re deleveraging while 0315.HK stands at 18.21%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.23%
We expand SG&A while 0315.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.