PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.44 - 1.45
1.18 - 2.36
61.0K / 1.73M (Avg.)
-18.00 | -0.08
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.32%
Negative revenue growth while 0315.HK stands at 23.34%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-2.39%
Negative gross profit growth while 0315.HK is at 112.92%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-399.43%
Negative EBIT growth while 0315.HK is at 23.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.34%
Negative operating income growth while 0315.HK is at 22.61%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-714.16%
Negative net income growth while 0315.HK stands at 14.41%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-713.16%
Negative EPS growth while 0315.HK is at 15.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-713.16%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0315.HK is at 15.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while 0315.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.24%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
45.21%
Positive FCF growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
178562.95%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
178.11%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
28.80%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
366.34%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
321.78%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 19.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
216.09%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
79.08%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
83.79%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0315.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-129.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0315.HK is 2.88%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-35.33%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 0315.HK stands at 40.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
23.77%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0315.HK's 5.20%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-0.97%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0315.HK is at 1.93%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.18%
Inventory is declining while 0315.HK stands at 135.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.13%
Positive asset growth while 0315.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.66%
We have a declining book value while 0315.HK shows 2.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-7.72%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while 0315.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-2.08%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.